United States v. James L. Cochrane

Good Law
985 F.2d 1027·1993 WL 34967·71 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1976·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2285·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1078
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 199392-50200California1,731 words

Opinion

Opinion

James L. Cochrane appeals his conviction on two counts of making and subscribing a false tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (1), and twenty-three counts of aiding and assisting the preparation of false tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (2). The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231 , and this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm.

I

First, we consider whether the district court erred in denying Cochrane’s motion for a new trial on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel. Cochrane argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel during the proceedings below because (1) the court-appointed attorney assigned to assist his pro se representation failed to exercise care and skill in assisting him; (2) the retained attorney who conducted the trial failed to present to the jury the theories and authorities upon which Cochrane relied in forming his beliefs regarding the tax laws; and (3) the reappointed attorney who represented him throughout the post-trial proceedings failed to present his new trial motion properly. We review the district court’s denial of a new trial motion for abuse of discretion. United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.