Leland Neal Lapier v. Jack McCormick Warden, Montana State Prison

Good Law
986 F.2d 303·1993 WL 34979·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2276·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1077
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 199391-35832California1,497 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

LaPier appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction in Montana state court for aggravated burglary, aggravated kidnapping, and felony assault. This case turns on whether LaPier is an Indian for purposes of criminal jurisdiction. If he is such an Indian, the Montana state court lacked criminal jurisdiction over him. The district court found that LaPier was not an Indian for these purposes. We affirm, but employ a different analytical test.

Following a jury trial in Montana state court, LaPier was found guilty of aggravated burglary, aggravated kidnapping, and felony assault. State v. LaPier, 242 Mont. 335 , 790 P.2d 983, 984 (1990). The underlying offenses "occurred within the exterior boundaries of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation," and "[t]he victim was non-Indian." Id. 790 F.2d at 986. Indian country criminal jurisdiction is allocated among federal, state, and tribal courts depending on "the subject matter of the crime, the persons involved in the crime, and the locus of the crime," Scott W. Wilson, Comment, Criminal Jurisdiction in Montana Indian Country, 47 Mont.L.Rev. 513, 513 (1986); see also Kevin Meisner, Comment,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.