United States v. Manuel Larry Jackson

Good Law
986 F.2d 312·1993 WL 38119·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2394·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1107
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 199391-50608California943 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manuel Larry Jackson appeals his 210-month sentence imposed following his jury conviction for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) (1988). Jackson contends the district court erred by enhancing his sentence under the career offender provision of United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 4B1.1 (1990) because a prior California conviction for attempted first-degree burglary was not a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. §§ 4B1.1 and 4B1.2 (1990). The attempted burglary conviction resulted from Jackson attempting to enter a residence through a window and then fleeing over a fence.

Jackson also contends that the district court erred in not departing downward from the guideline range. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

CAREER OFFENDER

The district court’s determination that Jackson is a career offender is an interpretation of the guidelines, and is reviewed de novo. United States v. Becker, 919 F.2d 568, 570 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1118 , 113 L.Ed.2d 226 (1991).

Jackson argues that his conviction for attempted first-degree burglary did not involve the threat of physical force against another, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.