United States v. Michael E. Gaudin

Good Law
986 F.2d 1267·1993 WL 38104·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2398·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1105
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 199390-30334California2,689 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hug, J.

This case involves an alleged scheme in which Gaudin purchased houses, then entered into sham sales transactions at inflated appraised prices, obtained loans on the basis of the inflated prices, reacquired the property, rented it, failed to make the mortgage payments, and applied the rents to his own use. He was convicted of equity skimming, a violation of 12 U.S.C. § 1709-2 , for his failure to pay the HUD/FHA insured mortgages while retaining the rents on the secured properties and applying them to his own use. He was also convicted of 43 counts of violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for false statements made on the loan documents submitted.

The issue on the equity skimming charge is whether sufficient evidence was adduced to sustain the conviction. The principal issue on the false statement counts is whether the district court erred in instructing the jury that one of the elements of the crime, the materiality of the statements, was established as a matter of law. Because we reverse these 43 counts on this issue, we need not address the other claimed evidentiary and instructional errors involving those counts. We find sufficient evidence to sustain the equity skimming charge and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.