Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Espy

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 2800·986 F.2d 1568·23 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20691·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 3431·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1525
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 199392-15269California9,425 words

Opinion

Opinion

986 F.2d 1568 81 Ed. Law Rep. 439 , 23 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,691 MT. GRAHAM RED SQUIRREL, (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus grahamensis), an endangered species; National Audubon Society, a non-profit corporation; Sierra Club, Inc.; National Wildlife Federation, a non-profit association, Arizona Wildlife Federation, a non-profit corporation; Maricopa Audubon Society, a non-profit association; Tucson Audubon Society, a non-profit association; Prescott Audubon Society, a non-profit association; Yuma Audubon Society, a non-profit association; Northern Arizona Audubon Society, a non-profit association; Defenders of Wildlife, a non-profit organization; and Wayne Woods, an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mike ESPY, * in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture; F. Dale Robertson, in his official capacity as Chief Forester, U.S. Forest Service; David F. Jolly, in his official capacity as Regional Forester for the Southwestern Region; Bruce Babbitt, ** in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; John F. Turner, *** in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Defendants-Appellees, State of Arizona Board of Regents, University of Arizona,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.