Pedrina v. Chun

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 2901·987 F.2d 608·25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 421·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 3546·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1572
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 199392-15065California1,233 words

Opinion

Opinion

987 F.2d 608 25 Fed.R.Serv.3d 421 Raymond PEDRINA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Han Kuk CHUN; Y.Y. Valley Corp.; Tetsuo Yasuda; Robert Carter; Masanori Kobayashi; Yoshinori "Ken" Hayashida; City and County of Honolulu; Frank F. Fasi, Mayor; Hiroshi Kobayashi; Eugene Lum; Nora Lum; Ernest Souza, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15065. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1992. Decided March 4, 1993. Thomas Lavigne, Kaneohe, Hawaii; Anthony P. Locricchio, Kailua, Hawaii, for plaintiffs-appellants. Paul Alston, Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing; Robert C. Godbey, Gilbert & Jeynes; Stanley E. Levin; Rodney Veary, Deputy City Atty.; James E. Duffy, Jr., Fujiyama Duffy & Fujiyama; Wallace S. Fujiyama; Mervyn Kotake; Eugene Lum; Robert J. Hackman, Goodsill Anderson Quinn & Stifel, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. Before BROWNING, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge: 1 Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in relevant part: 2 [A]n action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court (i) by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.