William C. Blankstyn v. United States

988 F.2d 117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William C. BLANKSTYN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16625. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CV-91-00452-CAM; C.A. Muecke, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William C. Blankstyn appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action seeking injunctive relief and damages in connection with the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) levy on his wages to collect taxes assessed against Blankstyn for tax year 1985. Blankstyn also appeals the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm in part, vacate in part and remand. I. Background 3 Blankstyn…