Farahmand Aliabbasibayan v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

988 F.2d 117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Farahmand ALIABBASIBAYAN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70477. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 22, 1993. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, INS No. Azg-qsu-lqm. BIA PETITION DENIED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Farahmand Aliabbasibayan, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") summary dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") order. The IJ denied Aliabbasibayan's motion to reconsider the IJ's denial of his motion to reopen. The BIA dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1 (d)(1-a)(i) and (iv), finding that Aliabbasibayan failed to specify adequately the reasons for his appeal and that the appeal lacked an arguable basis in law or fact. We have…