J.D. Adams v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

988 F.2d 117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. J.D. ADAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert G. BORG, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 89-55322. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 5, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CV-88-2359-WMB, William Matthew Byrne, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 J.D. Adams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus. Adams contends that he was denied his due process right to be tried by a jury drawn from a fair cross-section of the community, in violation of the sixth and fourteenth amendments. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and review de novo. Thomas v. Lewis, 945 F.2d 1119, 1122…