Harvey L. Beagle, II v. David Conrad, Harvey L. Beagle, II v. David Conrad

Good Law
988 F.2d 117
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 199392-35570California822 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Harvey L. BEAGLE, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David CONRAD, Defendant-Appellee. Harvey L. BEAGLE, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David CONRAD, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 91-35997, 92-35570. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 5, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; No. CV-90-1168-TSZ, Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding. W.D.Wash. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In appeal no. 91-35997, Harvey L. Beagle, II, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. In consolidated appeal no. 92-35570, Beagle appeals pro se the district court's revocation of his in forma pauperis status for purposes of appeal no. 91-35997. In both appeals, we have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.