Andrisani v. Mojave Pipeline Co.

988 F.2d 117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samuel ANDRISANI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOJAVE PIPELINE COMPANY; Kern River Gas Transmission Company; Marvin Middle, Senior Right-Of-Way Agent; Federal Energy Regulatory Commission/California Public Utilities Commission; Klein, Wegis, Denatale, Hall, Goldner and Muir, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-56222. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-91-2861-WJR; William J. Rea, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Samuel Andrisani appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, see Building Material & Dump Truck Drivers, Local 420 v. Traweek, 867 F.2d 500, 505…