Charles D. Boags v. Beverly Hills Municipal Court Attorney General of the State of California

988 F.2d 117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles D. BOAGS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL COURT; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-55290. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 23, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-91-6327-JSL(S); J. Spencer Letts, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles D. Boags, a former municipal court judge, appeals pro se from the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. 1 Boags challenges his conviction for conspiracy to obstruct justice. He contends that the district court erred by dismissing his habeas petition on the grounds that he was no longer in custody when he filed the petition. 2 We review de novo the district court's dismissal of…