Truman Ackerson v. Edward Ackerson

Good Law
988 F.2d 117·1993 WL 69095·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10862
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 199392-36590California1,620 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Truman ACKERSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward ACKERSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-36590. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 2, 1993. Decided March 12, 1993. Appeal From United States District Court for the District of Montana, No. CV-85-00288-GF; Paul Hatfield, District Judge, Presiding. D.Mont. AFFIRMED. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, CANBY and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Factual and Procedural History. 3 This long-time family feud concerns the Ackerson family, and for the sake of simplicity the first names of members of that family will be used throughout this memorandum. Truman and Edward are brothers and their mother was Ruth. George is Edward's son. Ruth originally owned a parcel of real property known as Thelen Place located in Choteau County, Montana. Ruth, Truman, and Edward entered into a settlement agreement in 1983 regarding the property, with George…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.