Coozie Britton, Jr. v. United States of America U.S. Department of Labor Office of Labor-Management Standards Jerry G. Thorn

988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Coozie BRITTON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; U.S. Department of Labor; Office of Labor-Management Standards; Jerry G. Thorn, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15276. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. CV-91-20533-WAI; William A. Ingram, Chief Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Coozie Britton, Jr. appeals pro se the district court's order granting defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for judgment on the pleadings. We have jurisdiction to review the district court's order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 Britton, a federal employee, was a member and steward of the American Federation of Government…