Leopoldo Cardenas v. C/o Skillings

Good Law
988 F.2d 118·1993 WL 47232·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10836
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 199392-36762California616 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leopoldo CARDENAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C/O SKILLINGS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-36762. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 24, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington; No. CV-92-00333-JLQ, Justin L. Quackenbush, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Wash. REVERSED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Washington state prisoner Leopoldo Cardenas appeals pro se the district court's dismissal as frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint alleging that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated when a correctional officer stuck his thumb into Cardenas's anal area through his pants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291, and we reverse. 3 We review the district court's dismissal of an action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) for an abuse of discretion. Denton v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.