Gaspar Camacho-Sanchez v. U.S. Parole Commission

988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gaspar CAMACHO-SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee No. 92-35104. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 7, 1993. * Decided Feb. 17, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court For the District of Oregon; No. CV-91-920-FR, Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding. AFFIRMED. Before: D.W. NELSON, TROTT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gaspar Camacho-Sanchez ("Camacho-Sanchez") appeals the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, under 18 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988). Camacho-Sanchez filed the petition pro se, after exhausting his appeals with the United States Parole Commission ("the Commission"), which decided in May 1991 that he would remain incarcerated for the duration of his sentence despite a guideline recommendation which would have allowed for his parole. 3 Camacho-Sanchez argues that the…