Franceschi v. City of Huntington Beach
Opinion
Opinion
988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ernest J. FRANCESCHI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH; Huntington Beach Police Department; Tom Mays; R.E. Lowenberg; County of Orange, Municipal Court; County of Orange, Judicial District; County of Orange; Cecil Hicks, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-56255. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. * Decided Feb. 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CV-90-1385-SVW, Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. MEMORANDUM ** Before PREGERSON, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 Ernest J. Franceschi appeals from a district court order granting summary judgment for defendants-appellees. Franceschi alleges that defendants violated 18 U.S.C. § 1961 ("RICO") 1 and his Fourteenth Amendment right to substantive due process by using speed traps to cite him for speeding. 2 We have jurisdiction…