Franceschi v. City of Huntington Beach

Good Law
988 F.2d 118·1993 WL 31367·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10806
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 199391-56255California1,079 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ernest J. FRANCESCHI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH; Huntington Beach Police Department; Tom Mays; R.E. Lowenberg; County of Orange, Municipal Court; County of Orange, Judicial District; County of Orange; Cecil Hicks, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-56255. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. * Decided Feb. 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CV-90-1385-SVW, Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. MEMORANDUM ** Before PREGERSON, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 Ernest J. Franceschi appeals from a district court order granting summary judgment for defendants-appellees. Franceschi alleges that defendants violated 18 U.S.C. § 1961 ("RICO") 1 and his Fourteenth Amendment right to substantive due process by using speed traps to cite him for speeding. 2 We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.