Ramon Cano v. M. Kenney, Corrections Officer Sgt. Morris R. Mills, Lieutenant R. Letfor

988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ramon CANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. KENNEY, Corrections Officer; Sgt. Morris; R. Mills, Lieutenant; R. Letfor; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35486. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 24, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; No. CV-91-544-HJF, Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramon Cano, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Cano contends that defendants (1) violated his first amendment rights by punishing him for speaking Spanish; and (2) violated his right to due process under the fourteenth amendment by failing to schedule his disciplinary hearing within the time specified by prison regulations. We have jurisdiction…