Ramon Cano v. J. Agee, Corrections Officer G.C. Marshall, e.o.c..i.lt. w.c.delfs, E.O.C.I.LT.

988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ramon CANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. AGEE, Corrections Officer; G.C. Marshall, E.O.C..I.Lt.; W.C.Delfs, E.O.C.I.Lt., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35511. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 18, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; No. CV-92-1111-FR, Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramon Cano, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for prison officials in Cano's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Cano contends that prison officials violated his civil rights by (1) placing him in administrative segregation after Cano's altercation with his mentally retarded cellmate, and (2) by placing him in a cell with a mentally retarded prisoner. Cano also contends that the district court abused its discretion…