Ellen Braswell v. Los Angeles Unified School District

Good Law
988 F.2d 118·1993 WL 33868·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10810
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 199391-55365California1,477 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ellen BRASWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-55365. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. * Decided Feb. 11, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV 89-1522-JDG; John G. Davies, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before PREGERSON, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 On January 8, 1990, the appellant, a black school teacher, filed a third amended complaint against the Los Angeles Unified School District ("school district"), alleging claims of race and sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et. seq., and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. The school district moved for summary judgment. The appellant's counsel withdrew shortly before the hearing on the motion, filing a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.