Rudolpho Bustamante v. Roger Crist

988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rudolpho BUSTAMANTE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roger CRIST, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-16300. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 24, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CV-91-00153-RGS, Roger G. Strand, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rudolfo Bustamante appeals pro se from the district court's February 20, 1992 order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. This appeal follows the district court's denial of Bustamante's motion to reconsider. Because Bustamante's notice of appeal was untimely as to the district court's February 20, 1992 order, we review only the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Bustamante's motion and,…