Marie R. Fulop v. Priscilla A. Hamilton Usaa Casualty Insurance Halls Emergency Inc.

988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marie R. FULOP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Priscilla A. HAMILTON; USAA Casualty Insurance; Halls Emergency Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35865. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1993. * Decided Feb. 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana; No. CV-86-00080-PGH, Paul G. Hatfield, District Judge, Presiding. D.Mont. VACATED AND REMANDED. Before TANG, KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges: 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marie Fulop (appearing pro se) sued Priscilla Hamilton and Halls Emergency for injuries allegedly arising out of an auto accident. On the third day of trial, Fulop didn't appear in court. Instead, her sister passed the judge a note from a local physician that said Fulop had sought medical treatment at a hospital the night before, and needed two to three days of bed rest. Defendants moved to dismiss, but the judge denied the motion.…