Tim E. Conley v. Bruce A. Clark, and Harold B. Hanna, District Court of Washington

988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tim E. CONLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce A. CLARK, and Harold B. Hanna, District Court of Washington, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35986. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 4, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington; No. CV-91-122-JLQ, Justin L. Quackenbush, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Wash. DISMISSED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Tim E. Conley appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to set aside the district court's order staying his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We dismiss the appeal as moot. 3 On March 21, 1991, Conley filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Because the district court construed the action as seeking habeas relief, the court stayed Conley's section 1983 action and dismissed the habeas portion for failure to exhaust state remedies.…