Raymond Anthony Calderon v. Anthony Gordon

Good Law
988 F.2d 118·1993 WL 51836·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10842
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 199391-16719California821 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond Anthony CALDERON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony GORDON, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16719. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CV-88-01447-EJG; Edward J. Garcia, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond A. Calderon, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of its summary judgment in favor of prison officials in Calderon's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 We review the denial of a motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion, and we will reverse "only upon a clear showing of abuse of discretion." Molloy v. Wilson, 878…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.