Carlon v. City of Long Beach

988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles B. CARLON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, City of Long Beach Department of Planning and Building; Eugene J. Zeller, Superintendent of the City of Long Beach Department of Planning and Building; Tom Sauter, Senior Combination Building Inspector of the City of Long Beach Department of Planning and Building; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55029. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 4, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CV-91-2555-SVW, Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles B. Carlon appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Long Beach and two city officials (City) stemming from the City's demand pursuant to…