Digman v. United States
Opinion
Opinion
988 F.2d 118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William J. DIGMAN, as Administrator of the Goods, Chattels and Credits which were of Captain Jeffrey Scott Digman, USMC, Deceased; William J. Digman; Donna M. Digman, individually and as parents, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-56501. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 3, 1993. * Decided March 5, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CV-90-0688-GLT, Gary L. Taylor, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, HUG and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The district court correctly dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction. The Federal Tort Claims Act requires plaintiffs to file suit against the United States--not against an individual agency--within six months of the mailing of the letter denying any administrative claims. 28 U.S.C. §§…