Ivan Hernandez v. James P. McFadden

Good Law
988 F.2d 119·1993 WL 47224·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10628
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 199392-16172California1,192 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 119 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ivan HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James P. MCFADDEN, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16172. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 24, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CV-91-00557-JMR, John M. Roll, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Ivan Hernandez appeals from the district court's dismissal of his pro se § 1983 action against several prison officials. Hernandez alleged that the defendants deprived him of protected property and liberty interests by misclassifying his custodial status and thereby denying him the opportunity to appear before the Arizona Board of Pardons and Paroles to be considered for work furlough and home arrest programs. The district court held that Hernandez' claim was not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.