Willie C. Hearne v. James Rowland Edward Myers Board of Prison Terms

Good Law
988 F.2d 119·1993 WL 59361·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10636
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 199391-16246California737 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 119 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Willie C. HEARNE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND; Edward Myers; Board of Prison Terms, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16246. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 5, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; No. CV-90-20352-RFP, Robert F. Peckham, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Willie C. Hearne, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against prison officials who denied him a parole date. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 The district court construed Hearne's complaint as both a civil rights complaint and a habeas corpus petition and stayed the section 1983 action pending disposition of the habeas petition. See Young v. Kenny,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.