James Moore Harris v. James Blodgett Washington State

988 F.2d 119 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James Moore HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James BLODGETT; Washington State, Respondents-Appellee. No. 92-35159. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. * Decided Feb. 17, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington; No. CV-91-71-JLQ, Justin L. Quackenbush, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Wash. AFFIRMED. Before TANG, KOZINSKI, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James Harris, a Washington state prisoner, appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition. Harris claims that his due process rights were violated when the state Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (the "Board") revoked his parole for possession of a firearm even though a federal jury acquitted him of the same offense. We affirm. 3 In 1975 Harris pleaded guilty to various state offenses. In January 1976 he was sentenced to two concurrent twenty year terms to be…