Cedric Seth Harrison v. Charles Plummer, Sheriff

988 F.2d 119 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Cedric Seth HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles PLUMMER, Sheriff; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15612. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. CV-91-03374-TEH; Thelton E. Henderson, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. VACATED AND REMANDED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Cedric Seth Harrison, an inmate at the Alameda County Jail (the "Jail"), appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We vacate and remand with instructions to dismiss Harrison's action as moot. 3 We raise sua sponte the questions of whether the action below was moot and whether the district court therefore lacked jurisdiction over the action. See Mafnas v. Superior Court, 936 F.2d…