Michael A. Hunt v. Daniel Vasquez

988 F.2d 119 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael A. HUNT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel VASQUEZ, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-16175. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 5, 1993. * Decided Feb. 11, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CV-89-01667-EJG; Edward J. Garcia, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before ALARCON, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Michael A. Hunt appeals in pro se forma the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his convictions for robbery and first degree murder. Hunt contends that the district court erred in refusing to hold an evidentiary hearing on his claim that prosecution witnesses committed perjury at his trial. He also argues that the district court erred in dismissing the petition because his conviction was the result of the state's knowing use of perjured…