Patrick N. Jackson v. Domino's Pizza Corporation

988 F.2d 119 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Patrick N. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOMINO'S PIZZA CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16805. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Nos. CV-90-02965-MHP, CV-90-92966-MHP; Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Patrick N. Jackson appeals the district court's order dismissing his Title VII employment discrimination actions for failure to serve process within 120 days after his complaints were filed as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(j). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion, Electrical Specialty Co. v. Road & Ranch Supply, Inc., 967 F.2d 309, 311 (9th Cir.1992), and affirm. 3 Under Rule 4(j), the district…