In Re Heardway Development, Debtor. Heardway Development Jerry Anolik v. Sunrise Bank of California Tad Krezman Virginia Krezman

988 F.2d 119 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re HEARDWAY DEVELOPMENT, Debtor. HEARDWAY DEVELOPMENT; Jerry Anolik, Appellants, v. SUNRISE BANK OF CALIFORNIA; Tad Krezman; Virginia Krezman, Appellees. No. 91-15279. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1993. * Decided March 5, 1993. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel; No. EC-89-01576-VMeO, Volinn, Meyers and Ollason, Judges, Presiding. BkrtcyApp 9. DISMISSED. Before FARRIS, POOLE and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellants Heardway Development, a California joint venture, and Jerry Anolik appeal the Bankruptcy Court's dismissal of their bankruptcy petition. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel dismissed their appeal as moot on February 8, 1991. We find that this appeal is moot and dismiss. I. 3 At issue is the real property located at 5848 Hazel Avenue, Orangevale, California. In early 1989, Jerry Anolik was the owner of the property. Anolik fell…