John Liu v. James Schwartz Alameda County Superior Court

988 F.2d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John LIU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James SCHWARTZ; Alameda County Superior Court, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15891. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. CV-92-01094-CAL; Charles A. Legge, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Liu appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Oscar v. University Students Co-op. Ass'n, 965 F.2d 783, 785 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 655 (1992). We affirm. 3 Liu filed a complaint against the Alameda County…