William R. Knight v. Jeff Sanders, Detective Walter Spalding and Timothy Rupel (Officers), Tucson Police Department

988 F.2d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William R. KNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeff SANDERS, Detective; Walter Spalding and Timothy Rupel (Officers), Tucson Police Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16030. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 24, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CV-89-00172-RMB, Richard M. Bilby, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. [APPEAL AFTER REMAND FROM, 940 F.2d 668 .] AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William R. Knight appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action to the Tucson Police Department ("TPD") and the named officers and denying his motion for leave to amend the complaint. Knight also appeals the district court's denial of his motion for appointment of counsel. We hold that the district court properly granted…