National Labor Relations Board v. Farmer Brothers Co.
Opinion
Opinion
988 F.2d 120 148 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2320 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. FARMER BROTHERS CO., Respondent. No. 91-70530. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. Decided Feb. 26, 1993. On Application to Enforce the Order of the National Labor Relations Board, No. 31-CA-17677. NLRB AFFIRMED. Before BEEZER, BRUNETTI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") petitions for enforcement of its order finding that Farmer Brothers Co.'s (the "Company") interrogation of employee James Stayton-McGriff ("McGriff") about his former union involvement, termination of McGriff because he engaged in protected concerted activities both through the Food, Industrial and Beverage Warehouse Drivers and Clerical Employees Union, Teamsters Local 630 (the "Union") and directly, and other acts of interference violated Sections 8(a)(1) and…