National Labor Relations Board v. Farmer Brothers Co.

Good Law
988 F.2d 120·148 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2320·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10654
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 199391-70530California2,753 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 120 148 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2320 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. FARMER BROTHERS CO., Respondent. No. 91-70530. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. Decided Feb. 26, 1993. On Application to Enforce the Order of the National Labor Relations Board, No. 31-CA-17677. NLRB AFFIRMED. Before BEEZER, BRUNETTI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") petitions for enforcement of its order finding that Farmer Brothers Co.'s (the "Company") interrogation of employee James Stayton-McGriff ("McGriff") about his former union involvement, termination of McGriff because he engaged in protected concerted activities both through the Food, Industrial and Beverage Warehouse Drivers and Clerical Employees Union, Teamsters Local 630 (the "Union") and directly, and other acts of interference violated Sections 8(a)(1) and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.