Dariusz Kaminski v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
988 F.2d 120·1993 WL 80251·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10664
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 199392-70198California1,667 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dariusz KAMINSKI, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70198. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 23, 1993. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals; No. Aym-umx-xuy. B.I.A. PETITION DENIED. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dariusz Kaminski, a native and citizen of Poland, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order affirming the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") decision finding Kaminski deportable and denying Kaminski's requests for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We deny the petition for review. 3 * Administrative Notice 4 Kaminski contends the BIA erred by deciding his case based on political considerations rather than on an individual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.