Daniel T. Miller, Husband v. United States

988 F.2d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel T. MILLER, Husband, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 92-35503. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 4, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington; No. CV-91-391-FVS, Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Wash. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel T. Miller appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his appeal as untimely from a bankruptcy court's order. The bankruptcy court denied Miller's motion to amend its order dismissing his petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d), and we affirm. 3 A "notice of appeal shall be filed with the clerk of the bankruptcy court within 10 days of the date of the entry of the judgment ... appealed from." Bankr.R.…