Noll v. Shoquist

988 F.2d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William J. NOLL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sam SHOQUIST, Regional Administrator, U.S. Parole Commission, Belmon, CA.; Hope Baker, Case Analyst, U.S. Parole Commission; Teresa Mitchell, Case Analyst, U.S. Parole Commission, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16917. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 4, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; No. CV-91-03793-CAL, Charles A. Legge, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Noll, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action prior to service of process. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992), and we affirm. 3 Noll sought money damages and…