Ernest Moore v. North American Van Lines, Inc.

988 F.2d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ernest MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-56475. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 24, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; No. CV-88-1837-H, Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Ernest Moore appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his diversity action alleging that he is entitled to items of his personal property and household goods held by North American Van Lines, Inc. The district court dismissed Moore's action with prejudice on the ground that he failed to comply with pretrial procedures and court orders, and repeatedly initiated litigation by making false allegations in order to secure jurisdiction. We have…