Jack Lloyd Morris v. James Rowland

Good Law
988 F.2d 120·1993 WL 55154·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10659
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 199392-16451California725 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jack Lloyd MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16451. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 3, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; No. CV-90-01442-WBS, William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jack Lloyd Morris, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against prison officials pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. 3 The district court found that there was evidence of Morris's gang affiliation in the record to support the decision by prison officials to keep Morris in administrative segregation and that the hearing opportunities provided to Morris comported with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.