McPhaul

McPhaul v. City of Phoenix Police Department

Good Law
988 F.2d 120
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 1993120California1,468 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Olas McPHAUL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant, and Jose Cisneros, Officer # 4657; P. Apolinar, Officer # 5187, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15877. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CV-91-00311-SMM; Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Olas McPhaul appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the Phoenix Police Department and individual officers in McPhaul's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that police officers (1) arrested him without probable cause, (2) failed to protect him prior to his arrest from injuries inflicted by other arrestees, (3) denied him proper medical treatment, and (4) violated his equal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.