Morrical v. Bradford

988 F.2d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leo F. MORRICAL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ralph BRADFORD, Security Manager at Oregon State Correctional Institution; Gloria Holland, R.N.; Joseph V. Ochoa, Assistant Attorney General for OSCI, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35491. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 3, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; No. CV-91-6528-MRH, Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leo Morrical, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against prison officials for failure to respond to a court order. The district court had ordered Morrical to show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(j). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…