Edward P. Reddeck v. United States
Opinion
Opinion
988 F.2d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward P. REDDECK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-50746. Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 5, 1993. * Decided March 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR 77-0863-R-1; Manuel L. Real, Chief Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. APPEAL DISMISSED. Before D.W. NELSON, WIGGINS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Reddeck filed a petition for a writ of error coram nobis in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Judge Byrne's order stated: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PETITION OF EDWARD P. REDDECK: CR 77-863-R ORDER DENYING WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS 2 The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Writ of Error Coram Nobis and will deem that pages 36-38 as a motion for the recusal of Chief Judge Real. The Court finds that there is neither a legal nor factual basis for…