Edward P. Reddeck v. United States

Good Law
988 F.2d 121·1993 WL 69164·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10688
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 199391-50746California417 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward P. REDDECK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-50746. Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 5, 1993. * Decided March 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR 77-0863-R-1; Manuel L. Real, Chief Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. APPEAL DISMISSED. Before D.W. NELSON, WIGGINS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Reddeck filed a petition for a writ of error coram nobis in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Judge Byrne's order stated: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PETITION OF EDWARD P. REDDECK: CR 77-863-R ORDER DENYING WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS 2 The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Writ of Error Coram Nobis and will deem that pages 36-38 as a motion for the recusal of Chief Judge Real. The Court finds that there is neither a legal nor factual basis for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.