John Patton Reihley v. Joseph McGill Dr.

988 F.2d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Patton REIHLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph MCGILL, Dr., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16490. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 4, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CV-91-00631-WDB, William D. Browning, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Patton Reihley, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants, a doctor and other jail officials, in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. He contends that the district court erred by: (1) finding that the doctor and jail officials were not deliberately indifferent to his medical needs; (2) finding that jail officials did not subject him to unconstitutional conditions of confinement; and (3) denying his request for the…