James E. Pennington v. Charles Ryan, Warden, Az Prison Complex-Winslow

988 F.2d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James E. PENNINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles RYAN, Warden, AZ Prison Complex-Winslow; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15699. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CV-91-00147-EHC; Earl H. Carroll, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James E. Pennington, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 1 Pennington, who is African-American, contends that (1) defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs by drawing pictures of a swastika and iron cross on his medication packages; and (2) defendants discriminated against him on the basis…