Portland Audubon Soc. v. Oregon Lands Coalition

988 F.2d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. PORTLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY, et al., Petitioners, v. OREGON LANDS COALITION et al., Intervenors, v. THE ENDANGERED SPECIES COMMITTEE, Respondent, v. WESTERN COUNCIL OF INDUSTRIAL WORKERS, et al., Respondents-Intervenors. No. 92-70436. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Motion Argued and Submitted Sept. 23, 1992. Decided Feb. 10, 1993. Petition to Review a Decision of the Endangered Species Committee. DENIED AND REMANDED. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 For the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion, it is 2 ORDERED that the Endangered Species Committee hold, with the aid of a specially-appointed administrative law judge, an evidentiary hearing to determine the nature, content, extent, source, and effect of any ex parte communications that may have been occurred between any member of the Committee and its staff and the President or any member of his staff while…