Smith by Smith v. Cryolab Health Ben. Plan

988 F.2d 121 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8234 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William Leonard SMITH, by his Guardian Ad Litem, Maudiebell SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRYOLAB HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN; Cryolab Inc.; Dave Martindale, in his capacity as named fiduciary of an Employee Benefit Plan, Defendants, and Tomford Insurance Administrators, Inc.; Safeco Life Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55169. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. Decided Feb. 11, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-88-3370-AWT; A. Wallace Tashima, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before PREGERSON, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant William Leonard Smith appeals the district court's dismissal of his action against Safeco Insurance, Tomford Insurance Administrators, and the Cryolab Health Benefit Plan, alleging violations of the Racketeer…