Lacey Mark Sivak v. Derek Butler Steven Shayne Lisa Cates Dave Paskett, Warden

988 F.2d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lacey Mark SIVAK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Derek BUTLER; Steven Shayne; Lisa Cates; Dave Paskett, Warden, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36570. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, No. CV-90-233-MHW; Mikel H. Williams, Magistrate, Presiding. D.Idaho AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lacey Sivak, an Idaho state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in Sivak's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against several Idaho state prison officials. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 Sivak filed a…