Virgil Sayre Pacvid Incorporated v. Burle Industries Incorporated George Brody

Good Law
988 F.2d 121·1993 WL 45301·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10673
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 199391-55289California1,803 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Virgil SAYRE; Pacvid Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BURLE INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED; George Brody, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55289. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. Decided Feb. 23, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-90-3044-RMT; Robert M. Takasugi, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. REVERSED AND REMANDED. 1 Before BEEZER, BRUNETTI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Plaintiff/appellant Virgil Sayre appeals the district court's dismissal of his suit against Burle Industries, Inc. for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendant. We reverse and remand. 4 * Appellant Virgil Sayre is a California resident and president of plaintiff/appellant PACVID, Inc. (collectively, "Sayre"). Sayre filed this action against Burle Industries, Inc., and George Brody, 1 asserting several…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.